Fewer users lost to friction
People rarely report confusing screens. They just leave. Usability testing shows you where and why.
[ Why non-functional testing ]
A feature can pass every functional test and still let users down. The sign-up form works, but a screen reader can’t find the submit button. The price is right, but shows the wrong currency format in Germany. The page loads, but the layout breaks on the phone half your customers own. Non-functional testing finds these gaps.
People rarely report confusing screens. They just leave. Usability testing shows you where and why.
Around one in four adults lives with a disability. Accessible products reach them and lower your legal exposure.
Find layout breaks, wrong formats and awkward translations before your new customers do.
Enterprise and public-sector buyers ask for accessibility and compliance proof. You’ll have it ready.
[ 6 non-functional testing types ]
Each type answers a different question about quality. Here is what each one covers, when you need it and what you receive.
We watch real people try to complete real tasks in your product, and note where they hesitate, get lost or give up.
Before a redesign, when conversion drops, or when support tickets start with “I can’t find…”.
Your product checked against WCAG 2.2 AA with automated scans, careful manual review and the screen readers your users rely on.
Before a public launch or procurement bid, or when a customer asks for an accessibility statement.
Translated screens checked in context, so text fits, reads naturally and feels local to the people using it.
Before entering a new market or releasing a new language.
Ensuring the compatibility of your software with different devices, operating systems, and browsers.
Before every major release, and whenever a browser or OS update ships.
Checks that your code is ready for other languages and regions before translation starts, when fixes are still cheap.
Before you plan a second language or region, ideally while the feature is being built.
The controls your customers and auditors ask about, tested release by release, with the evidence to show it.
Before an audit, a regulated launch or an enterprise security review.
[ Standards we test against ]
Buyers, regulators and courts don’t ask whether your product feels accessible or secure. They ask which standard it meets. We map every finding to the standard behind it.
We test the controls and hand over evidence. We are not an auditor and don’t issue certificates.
[ How we work ]
You always know what we’re checking, why it matters and what you’ll receive. Every report, recording and evidence file belongs to you.
We agree the journeys, markets, devices and standards that matter, and what “good” looks like for each.
We map who your users are, the languages they read and the browsers and devices they actually use.
Automated scans, manual expert review, screen reader passes and user sessions, run against the agreed scope.
Each finding explained in plain words, mapped to its standard and ranked by impact on users.
We help your developers understand each fix, then retest until it passes.
A clean record of what was tested, what passed and what is still open.
[ Tools ]
28 tools across six jobs. Tools find the obvious issues quickly; our testers find the rest. We’re happy to work with the tools your team already uses.
Scans and audits that catch the obvious first.
How blind and low-vision users really experience it.
Seeing where people struggle.
The real combinations your users have.
Strings, translations and locales.
Where results become audit evidence.
See every tool we use on our technology stack page →
[ Case Studies ]
Each one links to the full write-up by the engineers who ran it.
[ Ways to work ]
A one-off audit, a check before every release or a specialist in your team. You can switch as your product grows.
[ FAQ ]
{{ f.a }}
[ Contact us ]
✓ Free one-week POC✓ NDA before access✓ A QA lead replies the same day