Breaking changes between services
One team renames a field, another team’s service fails in production.
[ Why API automation testing matters ]
API automation sends real requests to your endpoints and checks status, payloads, schemas and side effects, with no browser or device in the way. It runs in seconds and tells you which service broke, not just that something did.
UI tests still matter, but they’re slower and vaguer. A solid API suite underneath catches most logic and integration bugs earlier, and keeps your web and mobile suites short.
Need broader API testing, including security and performance reviews? See API testing services →
The problems it solves
One team renames a field, another team’s service fails in production.
A UI test fails minutes into a run, and someone spends an hour finding which call was wrong.
Partners and client apps build against a spec the API no longer follows.
Every role, bad input and data combination is too many requests to check manually each release.
[ How it helps your product ]
Five outcomes engineering leads ask us about, and how a well-built API suite delivers each one.
API suites run in seconds to minutes, so they can run on every merge and developers hear about a break while the change is fresh.
Endpoints, roles, inputs and error paths that no UI test reaches, checked on every run.
Contracts and schemas are verified before deploy, so a breaking change is stopped in the pipeline, not found by a client.
Bugs found at the API layer are quicker to diagnose, and a strong API suite means fewer slow, expensive UI tests.
No rendering or timing issues, plus isolated data per test, keep results steady, so a red build means a real problem.
| Manual or UI-only API checks | Automated API suite | |
|---|---|---|
| Time per run | Requests sent and checked by hand | Seconds to minutes, on every merge |
| Roles and error paths | A few samples when there’s time | Every role and error case, every run |
| Breaking changes between services | Found when a client or service fails | Caught by contract checks before deploy |
| Where a failure points | A UI step that stopped working | The exact call, payload and response |
| Docs vs behaviour | Checked occasionally, if at all | Responses validated against the spec |
| Where testers spend time | Replaying known requests | New endpoints, exploratory and edge-case testing |
Honest note: automation suits stable, agreed behaviour. New endpoints and unclear requirements still benefit from exploratory testing first, and we’ll tell you which is which.
For Drop Delivery, 1,200+ automated Selenium and API checks run per regression cycle. For KORRA, 600+ automated Playwright and API checks run per release.
[ Types of API automation we deliver ]
Most teams start with health checks, functional and regression suites, then add contracts, roles and integrations as the suite proves itself.
Each endpoint checked for the right status, payload and side effects when it gets a valid request.
The API checks you rely on before a release, run unattended, so a change in one service doesn’t quietly break another.
A short set of calls that confirms each environment is up and wired correctly right after deployment.
Requests chained the way your clients really use them, passing tokens, IDs and state from one call to the next.
Consumer and provider agree on request and response shapes, and each side is verified on its own, so a breaking change is caught before deployment.
Every response checked against your OpenAPI spec or JSON Schema, so missing fields, wrong types and undocumented changes show up straight away.
One test run against many data sets: boundaries, locales, currencies, plans and roles.
Invalid, missing and malformed input sent on purpose, to check the API refuses it cleanly and returns errors clients can act on.
Every role tried against every protected endpoint, so users and tenants reach only what they should.
Calls to payment, messaging, CRM and other third-party services checked against their sandboxes, or stubbed when sandboxes aren’t reliable.
Suites wired into Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure DevOps or CircleCI, running in Docker, with the right tests at each stage.
We take over existing collections and frameworks, fix flaky tests at the cause, and move between tools, such as Postman collections into code, when there’s a clear reason.
[ API styles & extra layers ]
Whatever your services speak, the suite covers it. Extra layers reuse the same requests for security, load, mocks and data.
API styles and protocols
Methods, status codes, pagination, filtering and versioning.
Queries, mutations, variables, error shapes and field-level permissions.
WSDL-based requests, envelopes and faults.
Unary and streaming calls, status codes and message structure.
Connecting, subscribing, message order and reconnects.
Messages produced and consumed, payloads, ordering and retries.
Delivery, signatures, retries and duplicate handling.
Service-to-service calls, contracts and what happens when one service fails.
Extra layers in the suite
Common OWASP API Top 10 issues, such as broken object-level authorisation and excessive data exposure, checked in the suite, with OWASP ZAP scans. Not a replacement for a penetration test.
Penetration testing →Key API flows reused in k6, JMeter or Gatling for quick load checks before a release.
Load testing →WireMock stubs and Testcontainers stand in for services that are unstable, costly or not built yet.
Records checked after each call, so a 200 response really means the data was written, updated or removed.
API helpers that create accounts and data for web and mobile suites, so UI tests stay short.
Web automation testing →[ How you benefit from working with us ]
Beyond the tests themselves: how we work with your team, and what you keep when the engagement ends.
We work with Postman, REST Assured, Karate, Supertest, Playwright, pytest and more, so we recommend what your team will keep using, and explain why.
Frameworks, collections and environment files live in your repository, with documentation. No proprietary layer, no lock-in.
Pact contracts and OpenAPI checks give separate teams a shared, tested definition of every request and response.
The same engineers can feed data to your web and mobile suites and reuse flows for load checks.
Every failure logs the request and response, and real defects go into Jira with the exact call to reproduce them.
A fixed-scope build, managed testing, a dedicated team or an engineer in your sprints. See all six.
[ Technology & tool stack ]
We pick each layer with your team, based on your language, your API styles and the pipeline you already run. On the right is an example layout.
src/test/java/ clients/ OrdersClient.java AuthClient.java smoke/ HealthTest.java orders/ CreateOrderTest.java RefundFlowTest.java auth/ RoleAccessTest.java negative/ OrderValidationTest.java contracts/ OrdersConsumerPactTest.java src/test/resources/ schemas/ order.schema.json data/ orders.csv config/ staging.properties openapi.yaml docker-compose.yml .github/workflows/api-tests.yml
Example only. Your layout follows your tools, language and team.
API tools, and where each fits best
Shareable collections with environments per stage, easy for the whole team to explore.
Runs Postman collections from the command line and in CI.
Java teams who want API tests in code alongside TestNG or JUnit.
Readable, Gherkin-style API tests with built-in assertions and little code.
SOAP and WSDL-based services.
Node.js services tested in-process with Mocha or Jest.
Teams already on Playwright, mixing API and UI steps in one test.
Playwright testing services →Python teams who want lightweight, readable API tests.
Git-friendly API collections stored as plain files.
Exploring and debugging REST and GraphQL requests.
Comparing tools in depth? See our tool-agnostic testing services →
[ How we work ]
You see working tests in your pipeline early, and you approve each stage before we build on it.
We review your services, API specs, release cycle and current tests, and rank the endpoints worth automating first.
Tools, language, structure, test data, environments and reporting agreed with your team.
A first set of real tests running in your CI, so you can judge the approach before we scale.
Critical calls first, then roles, errors, contracts, schemas and integrations.
Suites run on agreed triggers. We triage failures and log real defects in your tracker.
Flaky tests fixed at the cause, the suite kept in step with your services, and a walkthrough for your team.
[ Deliverables ]
Everything below is yours to keep, whether we stay on to run the suite or hand it over to your team.
What to automate, in what order and with which tools, and what should stay manual.
Every endpoint and the checks against it: happy path, roles, errors and contracts.
Committed to your repo, under your access controls, in your team’s language.
Organised collections with environments per stage, ready to run with Newman.
Pact contracts and OpenAPI or JSON Schema checks your teams agree on.
Jobs and quality gates in Jenkins, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Azure DevOps or CircleCI.
Allure or Extent reports with the request and response logged for every failure.
The exact call, payload, response and expected result, logged in Jira.
Each unstable test, its cause and the fix, so suite health stays visible.
Setup guide, conventions and a live walkthrough so your team can run and extend the suite.
[ Case Studies ]
Drop Delivery and KORRA run automated API checks on every cycle; DesignO and Workflo show our wider API and integration work.
[ Ways to work ]
A new suite, a rescue of an existing one, ongoing runs or an engineer in your team.
Not sure which fits? Find your model in four questions, compare all six or estimate your cost.
[ FAQ ]
{{ f.a }}
[ Contact us ]
✓ Free one-week POC✓ NDA before access✓ A QA lead replies the same day
[ Keep exploring ]