Reach more people
Millions of people use assistive technology. An accessible product works for all of them.
[ Why accessibility testing ]
A missing label, a low-contrast button or a menu that can’t be opened with a keyboard can lock people out completely. These problems are easy to miss if you have never used a screen reader, and automated tools catch only some of them. Accessibility is also increasingly expected by law and by buyers, especially in government, education and large enterprises. We test the way people with disabilities really use your product, and help your team fix what we find.
We test against the standards and give you evidence; we don’t promise legal compliance or certification. Want to watch real users? See usability testing →
Millions of people use assistive technology. An accessible product works for all of them.
Clear evidence against the standards your buyers and regulators expect.
Clear structure, good contrast and keyboard support help every user.
Every issue explained, linked to WCAG and paired with a practical fix.
Which ones apply depends on where you operate and who you sell to.
The international standard most laws and policies point to. Our audits test against level AA.
Required for US federal agencies and the products they buy.
US civil rights law; WCAG is commonly used as the technical benchmark.
The European standard behind the European Accessibility Act and public sector rules.
Ontario’s accessibility law, which refers to WCAG for websites and web content.
[ What we test ]
From a full WCAG audit to training your team so issues don’t come back. Each one lists what we do, when you need it and the problem it prevents.
A complete audit of your key pages, screens and journeys against WCAG 2.2 level AA, combining automated scans with careful manual testing.
Before launch, before a procurement or audit, and once a year.
We use your product the way blind and low-vision users do, with the screen readers they rely on.
For every audit, and whenever custom components change.
Many people navigate without a mouse. We check that every action can be done with a keyboard, in a sensible order, with a visible focus.
For every audit and every new interactive feature.
Automated tools quickly find common problems across many pages. We use them for breadth, then confirm and add context by hand.
At the start of an audit and on a regular schedule.
Native apps have their own accessibility features and rules. We test with the settings and assistive technology people really use on their phones.
Before every major app release.
Downloadable documents are often the least accessible part of a site. We check that PDFs and documents can be read with assistive technology.
For public reports, forms, statements and policies.
Buyers often ask for an Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR), usually built on the VPAT template. We provide the test evidence you need to complete it accurately.
Before selling to government, education or large enterprises.
A list of problems is only useful if your team can fix them. We explain each issue in plain words, suggest a fix and check it once it is done.
After every audit, until issues are closed.
Automated accessibility checks in your pipeline, so common problems are caught before they are merged.
Once the main issues from an audit are fixed.
Sessions with people who use screen readers, keyboard navigation, magnification, voice control or switch devices every day.
For public-facing products and before major launches. See also usability testing.
Accessibility problems are cheapest to fix in design. We review your Figma files and prototypes before development starts.
During design, before build.
Short, practical sessions and checklists that help designers, developers and testers build accessibility into their everyday work.
After an audit, or when your team is starting out.
[ Automated vs manual vs real users ]
We combine all three. Here is what each finds, and what a real accessibility issue report looks like.
| Method | What it finds | Strengths and limits |
|---|---|---|
| Automated scans | Finds common, detectable issues across many pages | Fast and wide, but catches only part of WCAG |
| Manual expert testing | Checks every criterion with screen readers and keyboard | Thorough and accurate; needed for conformance |
| Testing with disabled users | Shows real barriers in real use | Reveals what experts may miss; slower to run |
Example only. Real issues come from your own audit.
[ How we work ]
Automated breadth, manual depth and real fixes, with evidence you can use for statements and procurement.
Pages, journeys, platforms and the standards that apply to your markets.
Automated tools across your templates, with false positives removed.
Screen readers, keyboard, zoom, contrast and every WCAG criterion.
Severity, user impact and fix guidance, in plain words.
Answer developer questions and retest every fix.
CI checks, training and evidence for your ACR or statement.
[ Tools ]
12 tools across four jobs. Tools find patterns; people confirm what users really experience.
Wide, fast coverage.
How it really sounds.
Contrast and PDFs.
Real phones and browsers.
See every tool we use on our technology stack page →
[ Case Studies ]
Each one links to the full write-up by the engineers who ran it. Accessibility was part of our work for Supply Ontario; the others show our wider QA work.
[ Ways to work ]
A one-off audit, checks every release, or VPAT evidence before a big sale.
Not sure which fits? Find your model in four questions or compare all six.
[ FAQ ]
{{ f.a }}
[ Contact us ]
✓ Free one-week POC✓ NDA before access✓ A QA lead replies the same day