How do you price EdTech testing?

Start with a free one-week proof of concept. After that, fixed-price packages start from $499, and dedicated engineers are billed monthly. You can estimate your own scope with our Cost Utility before we talk.

How quickly can you start?

A pilot usually starts within a few working days of the first call. Dedicated testers can join your team in 3 to 5 days, so there is still time before term starts.

Do you test accessibility for learners?

Yes. We test WCAG 2.2 by hand with keyboards, NVDA and VoiceOver, check captions and transcripts, and run axe and WAVE on every page.

Can you test our AI tutor?

Yes. We build question sets per subject with reference answers, then grade responses for accuracy, explanation quality, safety and staying on topic.

Do you test LMS integrations?

Yes. LTI launches, SCORM and xAPI tracking, grade passback and roster sync with Moodle, Canvas, Blackboard and Google Classroom.

How do you handle student data?

We use synthetic learner data by default and sign your NDA and data agreements before access. Real student data is only used under controls you approve in writing.

Can you load test for deadlines and exams?

Yes. We model peak traffic from your past terms and run JMeter or k6 scenarios on sign-in, content, submissions and quizzes.

Which tools do you use?

Selenium, Playwright and Appium for automation; Postman for APIs; JMeter and k6 for load; axe, WAVE, NVDA and VoiceOver for accessibility; OWASP ZAP for security; BrowserStack for devices.

[ EdTech testing services ]

EdTech testing that protects every lesson, every submission and every learner.

QA engineers for learning platforms, study tools and campus apps. We test content, assessments, accessibility and peak-time load, so learning keeps going when it matters most.

Get a free test assessment See client results

ISTQBcertified QA engineers
UpworkTop Rated Plus
100%Job Success Score
5.0 Clutch20 verified reviews
1 weekfree pilot on your learning platform

[ Industry challenges ]

What a bug costs in EdTech

The failures EdTech teams bring to us most often. Students don’t file bug reports; they just stop using the tool.

Submissions lost at the deadline

Thousands of students upload in the same ten minutes. If the system slows or drops a file, grades and trust go with it.

Answers and content that are wrong

A wrong solution, a broken formula or an AI explanation that misleads teaches the wrong thing.

Student data visible to the wrong people

Students, parents, teachers and admins each need different access. A gap exposes minors’ data.

Live classes that drop mid-lesson

Video, audio and screen-share failures break concentration and attendance.

Learners locked out by accessibility gaps

Screen-reader, captions or keyboard problems block the learners who need support most.

Timetables and schedules that don’t match

A wrong room, time or class change sends students to the wrong place.

[ What we test ]

Testing mapped to the learning journey

Each practice is pointed at a moment in a learner’s day, from sign-in to submission, and links to the full service.

Most critical

Courses, content & assessments

Lessons, media, quizzes, assignments, grading and feedback tested end to end, with content and answers checked for accuracy.

Accessibility & usability

WCAG 2.2 with screen readers, captions and keyboards, plus readability for younger and assisted learners.

Roles, privacy & data

Student, parent, teacher and admin access, and minors’ data protected under COPPA, FERPA and GDPR.

AI tutors & answers

AI explanations and solutions checked for accuracy, safety and staying on topic.

Performance at peak times

Deadline rushes, exam windows and term starts simulated before students arrive.

Mobile & devices

Phones, tablets and Chromebooks, on school and home networks.

Automation & regression

Repeatable suites so every term’s release and content update ships with the same checks.

[ Test scenarios ]

The checklist behind every release

Pick an area to see the scenarios we run, and the client platform where they matter most.

Where it matters · {{ ecCur.client }} {{ ecCur.product }} {{ ecCur.proof }} About our work with {{ ecCur.client }}

[ Compliance & standards ]

Tested against the rules learning platforms answer to

Schools and universities ask about privacy, accessibility and interoperability before they buy. We test the controls and hand over evidence your team can use.

COPPA · FERPA

Parental consent, age gates and access to student education records tested against your rules.

GDPR · UK GDPR · data privacy

Consent, data export and deletion for students and staff, and what each role can see.

WCAG 2.2 · Section 508 · ADA

Learning content, players and assessments usable by every learner, tested by hand and with tools.

LTI · SCORM · xAPI

Course packages and LMS integrations launching, tracking and reporting progress correctly.

[ Platforms, integrations & tools ]

The stack we test learning platforms on

If your platform or integration isn’t here, we’ll say plainly where we need ramp-up time.

Products

On client projects

Homework help & study tools

AI tutoring

Campus timetable apps

Web & mobile web

Native iOS & Android

PWAs

Platforms & integrations

What we test against

Moodle

Canvas

Blackboard

Google Classroom

Zoom & video players

LTI, SCORM & xAPI

Stripe & subscriptions

Google & university SSO

Automation & accessibility

Our engineers’ stack

Selenium

Playwright

Appium

Postman

axe DevTools

WAVE

NVDA & VoiceOver

BrowserStack

Performance & security

Our engineers’ stack

JMeter

OWASP ZAP

Burp Suite

All testing tools we use →

[ Case studies & results ]

Two learning products, from homework help to campus life

A study-help platform used by students worldwide, and a timetable app built by students for their university.

Study help & AI tutoring

Bartleby

Study helphomework answers and explanations

AI tutoringanswers students can trust

Subscriptionsplans, trials and access

The challenge

Homework help, textbook solutions, writing tools and AI tutoring for students. Every answer and explanation has to be correct, because students learn from it.

What we test

Step-by-step solutions and explanations
AI tutor answers and guardrails
Search across subjects and textbooks
Subscriptions, trials and cancellations
Writing and essay tools
Web and mobile parity

Visit bartleby.com

Campus timetable app · VIT

VITTY

Timetablesclasses, slots and changes

Campusbuilt for VIT students

MobileAndroid and iOS

The challenge

A timetable app from the Google Developer Student Club at VIT, showing students their classes and their friends’ schedules in one place.

What we test

University sign-in and timetable import
Class times, rooms and changes
Friends and shared schedules
Notifications before class
Web, PWA and mobile layouts
Load at semester start

Visit VITTY

[ How we work ]

Five steps, starting with a free pilot

The same process on a one-week pilot or a multi-year engagement. Only the scope changes.

01Day 1–2DiscoveryWe use your platform as a student and a teacher, then walk content, roles, integrations and the academic calendar with your team.
02Week 1Test strategyA risk map ranked by learner and institution impact, the scenario checklist and a device matrix built from your analytics.
03Every sprintExecutionManual, accessibility, automation, device and load testing on every build, inside your tracker.
04Daily & weeklyReportingDaily progress in your tracker, a weekly report, and severity-ranked findings with steps, screenshots and video.
05OngoingContinuous supportRegression on every release, readiness runs before term starts and exam windows, and the team scaled around them.

Engagement models

Compare all six models →

Pilot · Lowest riskFree 1-week POCA risk map, first findings with evidence and a test plan you keep. No commitment. Project-basedFixed packages from $499Agreed scope and end date: an accessibility audit, a term-start load test, an LMS integration pass. Dedicated team2–10 engineers, monthlyQA engineers who join your sprints, available in 3–5 days.

[ Why QAonTOP ]

Why EdTech teams pick us, and stay

EdTech domain, from live products

A global study-help platform and a campus app tested for real teams, not just listed on a slide.

Certified, in-house engineers

ISTQB-certified QA engineers employed by QAonTOP, not freelancers passed between projects.

We check the content, not only the screen

Solutions, explanations and AI answers checked for accuracy, alongside the features that deliver them.

Planned around the academic calendar

Testing peaks before term starts, deadlines and exam windows, not after them.

Student data stays private

NDA signed before access, synthetic learner data by default, and every test asset stays yours.

[ Social proof ]

Team really stepped up our testing with AI-driven automation. QAonTOP has improved product quality, and earned more clients. They feel less like a vendor and more like a true growth partner.

Lior M., CEOQAonTOP client Verified client

Clutch5.020 verified reviews

Upwork5.070+ verified reviews

Google5.040+ reviews

EdTech clients BartlebyVITTY

[ Free checklist ]

EdTech term-start readiness checklist

Not ready to talk yet? Take the checks we run before a new term, an exam window or a feature launch, with what a pass looks like for each one.

ContentAnswers and media are correct
AssessmentsSubmissions and grades hold
AccessEach role sees only its data
AccessibilityWCAG AA by hand and tool
LoadDeadline rush holds up
DevicesPhones, tablets, Chromebooks

Check your inbox.

The checklist is on its way. When you want a second pair of eyes before a release, book a free assessment.

[ FAQ ]

Questions EdTech teams ask us first

[ Contact us ]

Get a free test assessment of your platform

✓ Free one-week POC✓ NDA before access✓ A QA lead replies the same day

Book a free consultation

Related industries

All 14 industries →